Hi, VASP developers!
Serveral months ago, I report the LDMATRIX error in this post. I'm glad to see this was fixed in VASP 6.5.0 according to the kown issues page. While testing the fix, I found that vasp_std and vasp_gam now give consistent results for simple systems like NV centers in diamond and divacancies in 4H-SiC.
However, I've discovered a new serious problem with LDMATRIX when studying a slightly distorted NV center in diamond. Using identical input files and parameters, vasp_gam and vasp_std produce completely different zero-field splitting parameters - the differences are on the order of GHz, which is far too large to be numerical error.
Here are the key results:
the output of vasp_gam in OUTCAR is
Code: Select all
Spin-spin contribution to zero-field splitting tensor (MHz)
---------------------------------------------------------------
D_xx D_yy D_zz D_xy D_xz D_yz
---------------------------------------------------------------
214.365 -84.370 -129.995 2018.320 1100.951 872.224
---------------------------------------------------------------
after diagonalization
---------------------------------------------
D_diag eigenvector (x,y,z)
---------------------------------------------
-798.606 -0.261 -0.358 0.897
-1967.792 0.698 -0.711 -0.081
2766.398 0.666 0.605 0.436
---------------------------------------------
the output of vasp_std in OUTCAR is:
Code: Select all
Spin-spin contribution to zero-field splitting tensor (MHz)
---------------------------------------------------------------
D_xx D_yy D_zz D_xy D_xz D_yz
---------------------------------------------------------------
78.951 30.932 -109.884 1017.022 1183.335 1004.487
---------------------------------------------------------------
after diagonalization
---------------------------------------------
D_diag eigenvector (x,y,z)
---------------------------------------------
-931.181 0.507 -0.818 0.271
-1208.601 -0.616 -0.124 0.778
2139.782 0.603 0.561 0.568
---------------------------------------------
The differences are huge - both in the tensor components and diagonalized values. This suggests there may still be significant problems with the LDMATRIX implementation in VASP 6.5.0.
For reference, these calculations were done on a dual-socket AMD EPYC 9654 system using VASP 6.5.0 compiled with AOCC and AOCL 4.2.0. I've attached all input files and the OUTCAR file so you can reproduce and compare these results.
Could you please look into this issue? Such large discrepancies in the zero-field splitting parameters make the results unreliable for spin-defect studies.