I did the energy correction for Ni and Nb, etc, following the setting shown in 10.5 in VASP Manual.
To reduce the error (T*S) to less than 1 meV per atom, the value of SIGMA have to reduce to about 0.01 or even 0.005. Then the convergence was stuck. I had tried to modify the mixing setting follow the rules shown in manual, but it seemed nothing better.
What is going wrong? Did I make any mistake?
Some correlative setting is followed:
INCAR:
ISYM = 0 ! no symmetry
ISPIN = 2 ! allow for spin polarisation
VOSKOWN = 1 ! this is important, in particular for GGA
ISMEAR = 0 ! Gaussian smearing, otherwise negative occupancies
SIGMA = 0.005 ! intermid. smearing width
AMIX = 0.2 ! mixing set manually
BMIX = 0.0001
# NELM = 20 ! 20 electronic steps
ICHARG = 1
-------------------
POSCAR:
Ni-ec
20.0
1.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 1.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.0
1
direct
0.0 0.0 0.0
---------------------
KPOINTS:
Monkhorst-Pack method 1x1x1
0
Monkhorst
1 1 1
0 0 0
---------------------
POTCAR: PAW_GGA Ni
---------------------
Thanks for your help.
About the convergence problems in the course of energy correction for Ni, etc.
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
About the convergence problems in the course of energy correction for Ni, etc.
Last edited by guest on Fri Nov 12, 2004 10:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
About the convergence problems in the course of energy correction for Ni, etc.
For free atoms, there is no T-smearing of the levels, the atomic energy levels are discrete.
Hence the T*S term has no physical meaning
Hence the T*S term has no physical meaning
Last edited by admin on Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.