VASP and Wannier90 with SOC
Moderators: Moderator, Global Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2019 6:23 am
VASP and Wannier90 with SOC
Dear VASP developers,
I would like to report an issue regarding usage of VASP 5.4.4 and wannier90 2.1.0:
First, VASP has been compiled with the relevant -DVASP2WANNIER90v2 compiler option. Also, W90 is run in library mode with the lib file being properly linked to VASP as far as I can see.
In the attached files, you will see that the code runs as it should once "LSORBIT=FALSE", so that at the moment I doubt this is an installation issue.
However, once I use "LSORBIT = T" and the interface to Wannier90, then the VASP run goes through normally, however, the interface (i.e., the actual W90 calculation) crashes.
I'm now providing additional information from my debugging and tests that may be of help to you:
the most common thing to happen is that the number of projections simply runs too far. Please see attached tests, where I have saved the value of variable "nproj" into the sdout file of VASP. E.g., I expect to see an output related to ten projections, but the index runs further.
Further information, potentially not reliable: I think it is related to the file "mlwf.F" and the following cycle:
IF (proj_l(ICNTR)==0.AND.proj_m(ICNTR)==0.AND.proj_radial(ICNTR)==0) CYCLE sites
I'm speculating that something between wannier1.2 and wannier2.0 in terms of how spinors are handled must have changed, so that this condition (or another one close to the place of this one in the file mlwf.F) may require an update.
I'm happy to run further tests or provide further information.
Your help is greatly appreciated, thanks a lot!
Best wishes,
David
Attachment doesn't work at the moment, so here is a weblink to the test files I produced:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9g2kuvhzdeucf ... s.zip?dl=0
I would like to report an issue regarding usage of VASP 5.4.4 and wannier90 2.1.0:
First, VASP has been compiled with the relevant -DVASP2WANNIER90v2 compiler option. Also, W90 is run in library mode with the lib file being properly linked to VASP as far as I can see.
In the attached files, you will see that the code runs as it should once "LSORBIT=FALSE", so that at the moment I doubt this is an installation issue.
However, once I use "LSORBIT = T" and the interface to Wannier90, then the VASP run goes through normally, however, the interface (i.e., the actual W90 calculation) crashes.
I'm now providing additional information from my debugging and tests that may be of help to you:
the most common thing to happen is that the number of projections simply runs too far. Please see attached tests, where I have saved the value of variable "nproj" into the sdout file of VASP. E.g., I expect to see an output related to ten projections, but the index runs further.
Further information, potentially not reliable: I think it is related to the file "mlwf.F" and the following cycle:
IF (proj_l(ICNTR)==0.AND.proj_m(ICNTR)==0.AND.proj_radial(ICNTR)==0) CYCLE sites
I'm speculating that something between wannier1.2 and wannier2.0 in terms of how spinors are handled must have changed, so that this condition (or another one close to the place of this one in the file mlwf.F) may require an update.
I'm happy to run further tests or provide further information.
Your help is greatly appreciated, thanks a lot!
Best wishes,
David
Attachment doesn't work at the moment, so here is a weblink to the test files I produced:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9g2kuvhzdeucf ... s.zip?dl=0
- juergen.furthmueller
- Newbie
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:46 am
Re: VASP and Wannier90 with SOC
There are actually several problems and bugs (incomplete argument lists,
wrong countings, ...) as far as I understood. For working properly with spinors
various changes are needed in mlwf.F (and VASP needs to be interfaced with
version 2.x of wannier90). Chengcheng-Xiao has published a patch under
https://github.com/Chengcheng-Xiao/VASP2WAN90_v2_fix
which fixes all bugs and problems. With this patch there should be a good
chance that everything works properly as it should. Would be nice if one of
the vaspmasters in Vienna could incorporate this patch / corresponding
changes in the official VASP version(s).
wrong countings, ...) as far as I understood. For working properly with spinors
various changes are needed in mlwf.F (and VASP needs to be interfaced with
version 2.x of wannier90). Chengcheng-Xiao has published a patch under
https://github.com/Chengcheng-Xiao/VASP2WAN90_v2_fix
which fixes all bugs and problems. With this patch there should be a good
chance that everything works properly as it should. Would be nice if one of
the vaspmasters in Vienna could incorporate this patch / corresponding
changes in the official VASP version(s).
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2019 7:18 am
Re: VASP and Wannier90 with SOC
We are working on upgrading the interface with Wannier90 to v3.1, which will be released in Vasp 6.2.
- chengcheng_xiao1
- Newbie
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 6:23 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: VASP and Wannier90 with SOC
Thanks Juergen for pointing out my repo!juergen.furthmueller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 06, 2020 12:45 pm There are actually several problems and bugs (incomplete argument lists,
wrong countings, ...) as far as I understood. For working properly with spinors
various changes are needed in mlwf.F (and VASP needs to be interfaced with
version 2.x of wannier90). Chengcheng-Xiao has published a patch under
https://github.com/Chengcheng-Xiao/VASP2WAN90_v2_fix
which fixes all bugs and problems. With this patch there should be a good
chance that everything works properly as it should. Would be nice if one of
the vaspmasters in Vienna could incorporate this patch / corresponding
changes in the official VASP version(s).
Glad to know that! (except I don't have a valid license for VASP6...) Hopefully my patch is useful to some degrees for you guys!martin.schlipf wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:21 am We are working on upgrading the interface with Wannier90 to v3.1, which will be released in Vasp 6.2.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
Just a small question, will the new interface in VASP v6.2 have the full capabilities as pw2wannier90? (spn, uhu, uiu, dng, sym, etc)
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: VASP and Wannier90 with SOC
We currently not planning to add support for symmetry adapted Wannier functions.Just a small question, will the new interface in VASP v6.2 have the full capabilities as pw2wannier90? (spn, uhu, uiu, dng, sym, etc)
We might still include the writing of the spn, uhu, uiu files though.
About 'dng', I don't know what you referring to.
- chengcheng_xiao1
- Newbie
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 6:23 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: VASP and Wannier90 with SOC
Ah, I mean "dmn" matrix for the symmetry adapted mode.
So I guess SCDM is also not going to happen in the near future. Anyhow, thanks for the update! Looking forward to it!![Grin ;D](./images/smilies/grin.gif)
So I guess SCDM is also not going to happen in the near future. Anyhow, thanks for the update! Looking forward to it!
![Grin ;D](./images/smilies/grin.gif)
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: VASP and Wannier90 with SOC
Just an heads up: we have expanded the documentation regarding how to obtain Wannier functions using VASP:
wiki/index.php/Category:Wannier_functions
wiki/index.php/Category:Wannier_functions
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: VASP and Wannier90 with SOC
Hi Chengcheng Xiao,
I am writing to let you know that we included the feature to write SPN files for wannier90 in the last release of VASP 6.4.3:
https://www.vasp.at/wiki/index.php/Changelog
Give it a try and let us know in case you encounter any issues.
I am writing to let you know that we included the feature to write SPN files for wannier90 in the last release of VASP 6.4.3:
https://www.vasp.at/wiki/index.php/Changelog
Give it a try and let us know in case you encounter any issues.