Page 1 of 1

band gap underestimated with MBJ???

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 6:39 am
by hatdau
Hi everyone,
I have been trying MBJ calculation in VASP 5.3 using the new potential by including

Code: Select all

METAGGA = MBJ
LASPH = .TRUE.
in INCAR.

However I facing an interesting problem: the band gap is underestimated (opposite to what should be expected) for several systems, which only happened in VASP, Wien2k mbj give reasonable results. For example, a simple FCC latice of ZrNiSn has a band gap of ~0.5 eV with GGA, but a negative gap (~-.1eV) with MBJ. Another example is Mg2Si.

I've double checked with MBJ in WIEN2K which give a larger band gap.

Anyone has any idea on what happened?
Thanks

Re: band gap underestimated with MBJ???

Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:33 pm
by support_vasp

Hi,

We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.

Best wishes,

VASP